A fueling fable: Consumer protection issues with payments

by Naman Pugalia and Viral Shah.



On 22nd December 2011, we purchased petrol worth Rs.100 from an Indian Oil fueling station in Bombay using an ICICI Bank debit card. The receipt suggested that we could have saved a fuel surcharge of 2.5% had we used an Indian Oil Citibank credit card. Upon seeing this message, we asked the cashier at the petrol pump if we would be charged 2.5% over and above the Rs.100 that we paid for the fuel. The cashier assured us that only Rs.100 would be debited from the account linked to the card. The chargeslip and the receipt were:

The chargeslip

The receipt

A couple of days later, we viewed the account statement online and found that the relevant transaction had been recorded. A full week later, we observed that an additional charge of Rs.11.03 had been

debited from the account for the same vendor. Not only was the entry unusual, the charge did not match the 2.5% figure which was mentioned on the transaction receipt:

The statement

We wrote to the bank asking them to explain the transaction. The bank explained that for fuel purchased at non-HPCL petrol pumps, a surcharge of 2.5% of the fuel cost or Rs.10 (whichever is higher) would be levied. A service tax would be levied additionally.



There is a consumer protection issue here. After the account had been debited, and up until we sought a clarification from the bank, we were not made aware of the surcharge. The chargeslip gave a false impression of the amount being paid.



Upon delving further, we find various websites where people have complained about this surcharge being confusing. Further investigation revealed an interesting combination of participants:

1. The surcharge on fuel is mentioned in the fine print in Terms and Conditions of a debit card.
   
   


2. The bank that deploys the POS machine (acquiring bank being Citibank in our example), at the end of day, surcharges the higher of 2.5% or Rs.10 and sends it to the customer's bank (issuer bank being ICICI Bank in this case).
   
   


3. The issuing bank then creates a separate debit in the customer's account for the surcharge
   
   


4. The acquiring bank shares much of this surcharge back to Oil Marketing Company (Indian Oil in this example).
   
   


5. Contrast this with typical debit card processing fees in India around 1.5%. In most cases, merchants will inform a customer before surcharging, and the value on the chargeslip is what the
   
   customer pays.
   
   


6. Many banks apply these surcharges weeks or months after the transaction actually occurs, which helps ensure that most customers do not understand what is going on.
   
   

When paying for fuel in India with a debit card, the customer pays the
surcharge by being misled, the Oil Marketing Company makes higher
profits, the charge is administered in a non-transparent way, and is
posted late when the customer may not even recall the
transaction. Thus, Government owned companies and banks have created a
perverse incentive, whereby customers prefer to use cash rather than
pay electronically.