Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | |
CPI (IW) | 11.9 | 11.7 | 11.6 | 11.5 |
WPI | -0.7 | -0.2 | 0.5 | 1.3 |
WPI Food | 13.3 | 14.0 | 15.7 | 13.4 |
WPI fruits,vegs | 15.5 | 12.0 | 24.6 | 11.1 |
However, the year-on-year growth is the summation of the changes of the last 12 months. To get a sense of what is going on in the recent period, and to not be confused by ancient information, it is essential to look at month-on-month changes. This requires seasonal adjustment.
At http://www.mayin.org/cycle.in, we have a program of regular release of this data, which includes month-on-month changes expressed as `seasonally adjusted annualised rates' (SAAR). This shows:
Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | |
CPI (IW) | 40.8 | 10.2 | 10.8 | 8.1 |
WPI | 9.7 | 10.6 | 5.7 | 4.5 |
WPI Food | 52.8 | 14.7 | 7.7 | 13.4 |
WPI fruits,vegs | 39.6 | -23.7 | -3.6 | 33.2 |
This shows a rather different picture. We have food inflation, particularly with fruits and vegetables, given that we've just had a bad monsoon. But the overall WPI Food inflation contained one big jump in July and has slowed down after that.
The CPI(IW) gives a lot of weight to food. Hence, it showed a big value in July. After that, it has reported softer values.
The WPI itself was showing values around 10% in July and August, but gave values near 5% in September and October.
This, then, seems to be a relatively benign inflationary environment to me, particularly from the viewpoint of monetary policy. Monetary policy should not take interest in food prices in connection with a monsoon failure, because the time horizon over which monetary policy acts is long - perhaps between 9 and 18 months. By this time, conditions in WPI Food will have been reshaped by many new harvests.
0 comments:
Post a Comment